During recent decades populations of houbara are believed to have

declined drastically throughout the entire distribution range.

Over-hunting and severe habitat degradation appear to be the main

causes of the decline. While the species has been able to survive

a long tradition of falconry in Saudi Arabia, the widespread availability

of modern fire-arms and four-wheel-drive vehicles has made even

the most remote populations vulnerable to hunting, and contributed

significantly to the alarming decline over the last twenty years.

Overgrazing of the fragile desert flora by domestic livestock

has also caused massive loss of habitat for houbara.

Of all the bustard species, the houbara is the one most adapted

to the desert environment. Separated in three subspecies, the

houbara of the genus Chlamydotis is distributed over a wide range.

The nominate subspecies Chlamydotis undulata undulata inhabits

the north African range. Chlamydotis u. fuertanturae occurs only

on the Canary Islands and Chlamydotis u. macqueenii, of interest

to Saudi Arabia, ranges from Sinai to western Mongolia. The houbara

is thought to be resident in North Africa and the Canary Islands

whilst the populations breeding in central Asia are migratory,

wintering from Pakistan to Arabia where they overlap with the

local breeding populations.

The official IUCN category for the houbara is Vulnerable, which

includes populations that are seriously depleted, or decreasing

due to over-exploitation or other factors, and which are at risk

of becoming Endangered if causal factors continue unchecked.

The great cultural value of houbara in Saudi Arabia, and concern

about the possible extinction of local populations, prompted the

National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development

(NCWCD) to take conservation measures. These include the identification

of suitable habitat, habitat protection, studies of free-ranging

populations, the foundation of a captive breeding population,

and studies on feasibility of eventual reintroduction and restocking.

In 1986 Harrat Al Harrah Protected Area was established around

the last known houbara breeding area in Saudi Arabia. This reserve

(12,000 km2) of sand, wadis and black basaltic rocks, is located

in the northwestern part of Saudi Arabia, near the border with

Jordan. Hunting is forbidden and grazing livestock is restricted

to camels. In 1989 a second protected area was established at

Mahazat As Said and the entire 2200 km2 area was fenced to assure

complete protection against hunting and grazing.

In Harrat Al Harrah, between 1987 and 1991 searches for evidence

of breeding were undertaken. The population was found to be small

and patchily distributed, and only six houbara breeding attempts

were recorded in the reserve between March 1987 and July 1990.

Two researchers of the NWRC, P.Seddon and Y. van Heezik began

field studies at Al Harrah in November 1991, focussing on habitat

utilization and documentation of seasonal changes in houbara density.

The identification of specific habitats utilized by houbara may

assist in the location of suitable areas for protection, and possible

new release sites for reintroduction of captive-reared dirds.

Surveys showed seasonal changes in the numbers of houbara. The

population of houbara resident in the reserve in spring is probably

less than 100 birds and only eight breeding attempts were recorded

in 1992. Given that Harrat Al Harrah was set aside as the possibly

the last breeding location of houbara in Saudi Arabia, these figures

are very low indeed. Several questions remain to be answered:

where do the houbara that over-winter in Saudi Arabia come from,

and is there a clear distinction between resident and migratory

populations? To answer these questions satellite and conventional

radio tracking studies are planned, but progress depends upon

the ability of biologists to trap these cryptic and wary birds.

A captive breeding programme based at the National Wildlife Research

Centre in Taif, managed by P.Paillat and P. Gaucher , began in

1986, utilizing breeding stock from Baluchistan and Algeria. As

the species is known to lay a replacement clutch, authorization

was obtained from the two governments concerned to collect eggs

from breeding populations at the beginning of the reproductive

season in order to minimize possible detrimental impact on the

wild populations. One hundred and three chicks of the Asian subspecies

Chlamydotis undulata macqueenii and 129 chicks of the African

subspecies Chlamydotis undulata undulata contributed to the breeding

stock.

At the beginning of the project very little was known about the

reproductive biology of the species. In North Africa eggs are

usually laid between February and May but, occasionally, eggs

were found in Algeria as early as November or as late as June.

In Syria one can find eggs between March and May and in southern

Russia between April and June. Some authors believe that rainfall

is an important trigger for breeding and that this does not occur

in dry years. It was believed that sexual maturity was achieved

at two years old and the houbara was known to lay a single clutch

of one to four eggs.

Our captive brood-stock provided an opportunity to take a closer

examination of the houbara’s breeding biology. One of the first

results was that when plentiful food was available throughout

the year, the birds showed a seasonal breeding pattern with the

laying period extending from January to July. We developed the

hypothesis that an endogenous rhythm may have evolved to regulate

the annual reproductive cycle. Synchronising factors are most

likely to be seasonal temperature changes with rainfall acting

as a secondary factor, perhaps leading to a lengthening of the

reproductive period and thus allowing second clutches to be laid.

Although captive, well-fed houbara are able to lay from one year

old (6% of females), most undergo delay of maturity until they

reach three or even four years old. As one might expect, older

birds tend to lay more eggs. Records derived from egg removals

and stimulation of replacement clutches showed that the mean number

of eggs laid by C.u. macqueenii ranged from 1.7 for one year old

birds to 11.8 for those older than 3 years. Nevertheless there

is considerable variability in clutch size within each age class

with the maximum eggs laid by one female in a single breeding

season being 30 for C.u.macqueenii compared with 20 for C.u.undulata.

Reproductive parameters for these two subspecies are rather similar

although macqueenii generally displays greater reproductive capacity;

larger clutch size and smaller inter-clutch intervals.

Several natural management techniques were tested during the course

of developing a successful breeding strategy: isolated pairs;

heterosexual groups of various sizes and selective access to the

male via doors allowing only female passage. The search for an

optimal system continues since all of these methods yielded relatively

poor results with only 20% to 50% of the eggs being fertile. Problems

with natural breeding techniques led to the adoption of artificial

insemination. Sperm are collected using a dummy female presented

to a displaying male. When the unsuspecting male attempts to copulate

with the model-female, the manipulator collects the sperm. Immediately

after collection sperm is diluted and analyzed for concentration

and motility and then inseminated directly into the entrance of

the vagina of a receptive female. By improving the insemination

techniques the level of fertility increased from 50% in 1989 to

85% in 1993.

The release programme of the Asian subspecies, macqueenii, began

in 1992, under direction of Olivier Combreau. Since the programme

is still in its early stages relatively few results are available.

For re-introductions to be successful the actual release techniques

are a vital element in the programme. Even in suitable habitats,

captive bred birds may experience difficulties in adapting to

their new environmental conditions. Difficulties they encounter

include locating food, spatial orientation, avoidance of predators,

and resistance to infection. Both age and composition within social

groups are also factors that have a bearing on the ability of

released birds to survive in the wild.

In order to examine these aspects in more detail release experiments

were conducted in a 4 km2 mammal predator-proof pre-release enclosure

situated within the much larger 2200 km2 fenced and protected

area of the Mahazat As Said reserve. Pre-release cages were located

within alfalfa plots in the protected compound. Different techniques

were then tested with birds from one month to several years old,

all of which were subsequently tracked through solar powered radio-transmitters

with which they had been fitted. Trackers following the birds

from ground vehicles and light aircraft gather information concerning

their survival, dispersion, habitat utilization and social behaviour.

An earlier attempt at such a release programme, conducted in 1991,

failed when, within five days of their release, all of the captive

reared houbara were eaten by foxes. In 1992 coveys of two chicks

and a foster mother held for fifteen days in the cages and then

set free within the pre-release protected enclosure, also gave

disappointing results. The coveys showed a very high dependence

upon supplementary food and the hoped for apprenticeship in wild

feeding techniques, natural food selection, habitat utilization

and predator avoidance by the adult females did not live up to

expectations. On the other hand, sub-adult release, using birds

of around one and a half months old which were translocated from

the breeding unit to the pre-release cages gave somewhat better

results. Out of 31 sub-adults thus released, approximately 50%

were still alive inside the reserve six to ten months after their

release. It is too early to draw any conclusions about the release

experiments but the results obtained so far with sub-adults are

certainly the most encouraging. In the forthcoming breeding season

we shall be trying a variety of chick-rearing techniques aimed

at enhancing the birds’ ability to survive later in the wild.

In September 1993 an international workshop was organized by the

NCWCD in Saudi Arabia with the aim of reviewing progress and mapping

future directions of the houbara programme. Workshop participants

drafted recommendations that have formed a basis for a conservation

strategy. The recommendations include measures to improve houbara

habitat in Saudi Arabia, maintenance of a captive breeding programme,

development of techniques for captive rearing and release of captive

bred birds, promotion of public awareness and fostering of public

support for houbara conservation and, finally, taking a lead in

initiating cooperative conservation efforts between houbara range

states.

Captive propagation of the houbara has proven to be a difficult

task. After a disheartening year of infertile eggs, the first

breeding success was achieved in 1989 with the reproduction of

17 chicks. Fifty-five chicks were produced in 1990, 49 in 1991,

138 in 1992 from 60 laying females, and a record 283 chicks in

1993 from 75 laying females, allowing the release experiments

to begin in earnest.